 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Table of Contents
Abstract
Introduction
Conclusions and Recommendations
Canoscan 5000F
HP ScanJet 5550c
Microtek Scanmaker
6800
Epson Perfection 3200
Works Cited
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this feasibility study is to determine which of four new scanners would be the best to buy. I researched these four scanners: the CanoScan 5000F, the HP ScanJet 5550c, the Microtek ScanMaker 6800, and the Epson Perfection 3200 PHOTO Color. My decision was mainly based on the following criteria: could it scan film negatives, was it less than $700, and did it have a high resolution to produced high quality scans. I also took into consideration the general specs of the scanner including the packaged software, its speed, its interface, and the results of scan tests run and rated by PCWorld.com, the company that produces PC World magazine and specializes in reviewing computer products.
They are all good scanners, but from my research I believe that the CanoScan 5000F will be the most suitable scanner to purchase. It was given a 4 ½ star rating out of 5 from PCWorld.com, has a built in film scanner, comes with good software such as ArcSoft PhotoStudio, ArcSoft PhotoBase, and integrated FARE (Film Automatic Retouching and Enhancement) technology.
The FARE technology is what makes this scanner stand out from the rest. As it scans film negatives it can repair damage and remove dust particles. Since film scanning was an important factor, having the technology to automatically touch up the negatives themselves is a major plus. It has a maximum dpi of 2400 and the estimated street price is $199 which fits the given budget.